The Formula 1 world has been rocked by controversy after the FIA’s Mexican affiliate, OMDAI, officially placed blame on Liam Lawson for the terrifying near-miss incident during the Mexican Grand Prix — a decision that has stunned drivers, teams, and fans alike. What was nearly a catastrophic collision with two track marshals has now spiraled into a global scandal questioning the integrity of F1’s safety standards.
During the chaotic opening lap at the AutĂłdromo Hermanos RodrĂguez, debris littered the track following multiple collisions. Yellow flags were waved as Lawson approached Turn 1 at over 150 km/h, yet onboard footage clearly shows him reducing speed by almost 40%, demonstrating impeccable awareness and control. Despite this, OMDAI’s official report claims Lawson “failed to alter his trajectory” — effectively accusing him of negligence in an incident that was caused by human error, not driver misconduct.
“I nearly hit one of them. It was so dangerous — I’ve never seen that before,” Lawson said afterward, visibly shaken. “It’s unacceptable.”
The FIA’s main governing body has reportedly admitted privately that the marshals should not have been on the track, citing a “communication breakdown” between race control and track personnel. However, instead of owning up to the procedural failure, OMDAI’s decision to scapegoat Lawson has drawn massive backlash across the F1 community.
Veteran journalists and former drivers have condemned the ruling. One analyst wrote, “You can’t blame a driver for an incident that should never have happened. This is rewriting the rules of safety itself.” Fans have echoed that sentiment, flooding social media with anger and disbelief under hashtags like #JusticeForLawson and #FIAFail.
Insiders warn that if the ruling stands, it could set a terrifying precedent — forcing drivers to second-guess split-second safety decisions out of fear of punishment. “F1 has spent decades building a culture of safety,” said one team engineer. “This ruling risks undoing all of that overnight.”
As the FIA now faces immense pressure to intervene, sources say the governing body’s leadership is deeply divided. Some officials argue the FIA must protect Lawson and acknowledge the procedural failures, while others insist on defending OMDAI’s autonomy, even if it means sacrificing a driver’s reputation.
The stakes are monumental. With the Brazilian Grand Prix looming, the entire paddock is watching closely. The FIA’s next move will determine whether Formula 1 stands by its commitment to driver safety and accountability — or whether politics and blame-shifting will win the day.
“This isn’t about one driver anymore,” said an insider close to the investigation. “It’s about whether the FIA protects those risking their lives every Sunday — or lets bureaucracy destroy trust in the system.”
The world is watching. The clock is ticking. And Liam Lawson’s fate may now decide the future of F1’s safety legacy.
👉 Click the link in the comments for exclusive footage and leaked excerpts from the FIA’s investigation report that’s turning the paddock upside down.
